465
:
!
}
de frayed from the funds admini s-
tered by this department.
A similar claim was put
forward by the colonial authori-
ties on the previous occasion
when Edward Wallace was, under
apparently identical circumstances,
transferred to Hongkong from
the Consular Jail in Shanghae
in 1885, and the Secretary of
State for the Colonies express-
ed the opinion at the time that
the Consul in sending the man
to Hongkong had exceeded his
powers. This view appeared to
be justi fled by the fact that
the father of the lunatic who
was then residing at Shanghae
was in possession of an incone
sufficient
sufficient to make suitable pro-
vi sion for the care of his son.
An instruction was accordingly
addressed to Her Majesty's Minis-
ter at Peking requesting him to
make a communication to the Con-
sul at Shanghae in this sense and
to consult with the Crown Advocate
of the Supreme Court as to the
proper method of providing for
the lunatic's maintenance.
No
further report on the case of Ed-
ward Wallace has been received
until now, and Lord Salisbury
remains in ignorance as to the
exact circumstances of his di s-
charge from the Hongkong asylum,
and return to Shanghae.
When, at a later period,
Chief
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.